VEMO Analysis: tRPC
End-to-end typesafe APIs - 38,959 stars on GitHub
Analysis based on 100% real GitHub data from trpc/trpc repository
Executive Summary
Key Finding: tRPC is exceptionally well-managed with lightning-fast issue resolution (1.5 days vs 14-day industry average), yet VEMO identified $42K in optimization opportunities through automated maintenance overhead and context switching costs.
Stage 2: PM Analysis
Extracted from GitHub Issues, Pull Requests, and project activity over the past 90 days
Issue Velocity
Average time to close issues (93% faster than industry average of 14 days)
PR Review Quality
Pull request rejection rate (healthy - industry standard is 10-20%)
Automation Load
Issues from automated tools (Renovate dependency updates)
Hidden Cost Breakdown (8 VEMO Formulas)
Code Churn Cost (CCC)
Definition: Cost of context switching and reviewing automated dependency updates
Rework Cost (RWC)
Definition: Cost of rejected PRs requiring rework
Technical Debt Cost (TDC)
Definition: Cost of maintaining backward compatibility in fast-moving API
Context Overhead Cost (COC)
Definition: Mental overhead from rapid issue triage and prioritization
Quality Assurance Gap (QAG)
Definition: Testing gaps from speed-prioritized development
Additional Hidden Costs
Key Insights & Recommendations
Why This Analysis Matters
tRPC is NOT a struggling project. With 38,959 stars, 1.5-day issue resolution, and a passionate community, it's one of the best-run open-source projects in the TypeScript ecosystem.
Yet VEMO found $42K in hidden costs. This demonstrates that even elite teams have invisible inefficiencies. The costs aren't from poor practices—they're from the inherent overhead of maintaining velocity, quality, and security simultaneously.
Imagine the impact on your project. If a best-in-class project like tRPC has $42K in optimization opportunities, what's hiding in your codebase? VEMO reveals these blind spots through three-source validation, giving you actionable insights traditional metrics miss.